Well, I accept that the title is
absolutely stupid. Theorizing love. Yet this is what the entertainment industry
doing for centuries. Theorizing loves in the form of stories, novels, movies
and epics. But love depicted in movies is in a distorted way, giving a
misinterpreted picture and idea, thus overshadowing the natural feelings and
emotions of love. Arguments can be that, movies are reflections of real life,
but it is also to be remembered that ideas reflected in movies are reflected on
the society too. This has certainly affected the larger population of youth,
which is reaffirmed by more number of teenage clients in counseling
centers. So I felt a refreshing
perspective is need of the hour. Though I may not be much experienced for this
kind of write up, I believe, am as experienced as it takes. So here it is…
Love is togetherness, forever and
more, till death and even after that in the havens of god.
But there must be spaces in that togetherness, and let the music dance
in those little spaces.
Love one another, but let that
love not be as strong and mighty as a mountain.
Let it rather be as elegant and serene as a calm mountain stream
between the shores of hearts.
Fill each other with joy.
But let it not be the only source of happiness.
Stand together.
But let each of you to be alone, for strings of guitar are alone, but
they melt in music when in harmony.
Love is not stealing away the heart, but to give it happily, yet not
into each other’s keeping.
Love is not “I can’t live without you”,
But, “You gave me what it takes to go on without you”.
(Inspired from the works of Khalil Gibran)
(Inspired from the works of Khalil Gibran)
love is the solution for the human sufferings, but my doubt is where does the sex come before love or after the love.
ReplyDeleteAfter love...if sex comes before love, its lust.
Delete